Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Encino Park and Ride

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. If anyone wishes to merge the content here to elsewhere for editorially-sound reasons, please leave me a message on my talk page and I'll undelete and replace with a redirect to preserve history per AtD. Daniel (talk) 22:48, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Encino Park and Ride

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:NTRAINSTATION. Information could be incorporated into the articles about Encino and LADOT. CurryTime7-24 (talk) 20:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This entry should not be deleted. The Encino Park and Ride is a major commuter facility in the San Fernando valley, similar to other transit center and park and ride facilities already listed on Wikipedia. Jg10101 (talk) 21:06, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography, Transportation, and California. Skynxnex (talk) 21:12, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Park-and-ride bus stations are generally not notable and there are few mentions in the regional newspaper (LA Times). Sounder Bruce 21:32, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- What about the Vince Lombardi Park and Ride? Why is that more notable than this facility? They are essentially the same thing. Jg10101 (talk) 21:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  - Because the majority of that article discusses the study of the site for use as a rail station. Without that it shouldn't have an article either. Though that site is also a major service area for Turnpike and it includes several news articles discussing its history. If you had independent sources beyond the routine government pages then maybe something else could be written, but this is literally just a small parking lot a fraction of the Lombardi's size. Reywas92^Talk 02:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Just a parking lot with a bus stop. No significant coverage, no notability. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Los Angeles Department of Transportation#Commuter Express. Nothing beyond WP:ROTM coverage, mostly as part of bus lines. While a bus station, WP:NTRAINSTATION makes valid points. Shaws username . talk . 21:40, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
delete Seriously? We need an article on a parking lot? I mean, if it wee the world's largest or something like that, but it's not. Which is to say, no claim to notability for something completely ordinary. Mangoe (talk) 23:14, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Brossard-Chevrier Park and Ride (AfD discussion) has more independent in-depth non-directory sources discussing it than this has, moreover. There is not even that degree of sourcing that I can find in this case. Uncle G (talk) 08:05, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Just a parking lot, no significant independent coverage. Reywas92^Talk 02:40, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: textbook example of a run-of-the-mill article; there's no meaningful independent coverage of this parking lot. Left guide (talk) 07:56, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as about as non-notable as one could imagine, barring sources stating that the location used to be paradise. AndyTheGrump (talk) 15:06, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nothing in a before search, fails GNG. SportingFlyer T·C 10:29, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Mangoe's thoughts are mine too. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 16:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - It's a parking lot. It's not passing GNG either. RakdosWitch (talk) 00:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Devokewater|(tαlk) 11:44, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.